San Francisco to Singapore : 37-year-old American Who Allegedly Made False Bomb Threat On SIA Flight Charged

American_man_charged_for_making_bomb_threat_in_singapore_flight

A 37-year-old man was detained by police on a Singapore Airlines flight after he allegedly assaulted flight attendants and claimed to have a bomb in his carry-on bag, according to the police.

on Wednesday (Sep 28) American La Andy Hien Duc allegedly shouted that there was a bomb on the plane. He also grabbed another passenger’s luggage from the cabin’s overhead compartment, according to media reports.

According to authorities, they were informed of a possible bomb threat around 2.40am on board flight SQ33 from San Francisco to Singapore.

In a statement on 28 Sep the Defence Ministry confirmed the said that the threat was verified to be false, after the threat was made SAF and SPF were mobilised immediately.

“The Republic of Singapore Air Force’s F-16C/Ds escorted the aircraft to safety at Changi Airport, and teams from The Singapore Army’s Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Explosives Defence Group and Airport Police Division were on site to verify the claims. The threat was subsequently verified to be false, and the suspicious person has been arrested. Police investigations are ongoing”.

“MINDEF and Ministry of Home Affairs, Singapore work closely round the clock to ensure the safety of our country and people, and we will treat every threat seriously. We thank our teams for their professionalism and dedication to keeping Singapore safe”.

CHARGED

In a press release The Singapore Police Force (SPF) revealed that a 37-year-old male foreigner has been charged for allegedly causing alarm and assaulting a cabin crew while on board flight SQ33 from San Francisco to Singapore on 28 September 2022.

The man has been charged on 29 September 2022 with an offence of using threatening words likely to cause alarm, which is punishable under Section 4(2) of the Protection from Harassment Act 2014, read with Section 3(1) of the Tokyo Convention Act 1971, and an offence of voluntarily causing hurt, which is punishable under Section 323 of the Penal Code 1871, read with Section 3(1) of the Tokyo Convention Act 1971.

The offence of using threatening words likely to cause alarm carries a fine of up to $5,000. The offence of voluntarily causing hurt carries an imprisonment term of up to three years, a fine of up to $5,000, or both.

The police said that, under the Tokyo Convention Act 1971, if a crime takes place on a Singapore-controlled aircraft flying outside of the country, the offender can be charged with the offence under Singapore laws.

ASSAULTED CABIN CREW

In a statement on Thursday, the police said that preliminary investigations indicate that during the flight, the man had allegedly shouted that there was a bomb on the plane and grabbed another passenger’s luggage from the cabin’s overhead compartment.

A member of the cabin crew was allegedly assaulted by the man when he tried to intervene and restrain the man. Checks by the cabin crew did not reveal any suspicious items in the passenger’s luggage, the police said in a news release.

“The plane landed safely in Changi Airport at about 5.50am, under the escort of two of the Republic of Singapore Air Force’s F-16 fighter jets”.

“For the safety of all passengers and crew, officers from the Airport Police Division and Special Operations Command’s K-9 Unit, as well as the Singapore Armed Forces’ Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Explosives Defence Group, were mobilised to investigate the threat, which was found to be false”.

“As a result of the additional security measures implemented to ensure the safety of all persons on board flight SQ33, there was a delay of more than four hours in disembarkation. The 17 crew and 208 passengers disembarked at only around 9.30am”.

Preliminary investigations by the Central Narcotics Bureau revealed that the man’s urine tested positive for controlled drugs, the police added. La Andy Hien Duc has been remanded at the Institute of Mental Health for psychiatric observation.

The Police also remined that they will not hesitate to take action against anyone who causes public alarm with false threats.

“Beyond the fear and inconvenience caused to other members of the public, the making of false threats comes at a cost, in the extensive public resources that have to be deployed to deal with the incident,” the police added.

Follow us on Instagramtelegram

Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts